The House of Representatives narrowly passed an energy and climate change bill designed to revamp the nation's industrial economy.
But it barely passed by a vote of 219-212, which does not bode well for the fate of the bill in the senate where it is expected to undergo changes and rewrites. Even with Democrats holding the majority vote, 44 of them voted against the bill, although only three Texas dems voted against it.
Going back to what I said about pawns of the petroleum industry, Texas Republicans called the bill a "'monstrosity' that would result in 'epic job losses' and 'largest tax increase in history'," according to an article in the June 27th Houston Chronicle. To those and their ilk, I refer them to yesterday's column about cap-and-trade that distinguishes between cost and price.
Rep. Gene Green, D-Houston, on the other hand stated that the result "is a reasonable first step to protecting our energy infrasructure and keeping good-paying jobs here at home." This seems more consistent with the projections of non-partisan experts.
Only time, of course, will tell. But here's to hoping the Democrats and the experts are right.
1 comment:
Foxwood don't know me vewy well. Do I come across as someone who makes 250K+? I'm worried about the planet that our children are set to inherit, not my pocketbook.
Post a Comment